Mit der Steuergerechtigkeitsinitiative wird in die Souveränität der Kantone und Communities intervened. It begs the question whether it would not be better suited if the federalism is buried, and whether the essential to the present prosperity of Switzerland Contributed competition is no longer asked the cantons in the future.
The promoters intend, however, tax the exorbitant salaries and more to push the rip-off a tie. An understandable concern, the target is missed, however, clearly! The Federal Court bans graduated tax, consist in the design of progressive tax rates (still) no guidelines. This would allow income of CHF 70 million, also to be taxed 22%, which is the minimum rate for income of CHF 250,000 equivalent. Besides this aspect is important to remember that deliver well-earning already indirectly via the AHV additional taxes. AHV contributions from income of CHF 82,000 are not making pension and therefore to qualify as a tax. Also provide higher-income people from ending on VAT tax and also ensure significant economic growth. The assumption is certainly acceptable that well-earning verkonsumieren more.
is fair to certify that it is rather difficult to estimate how many taxpayers rely on the assumption of the initiative ultimately to Switzerland. What is certain, that an undesired signal effect is obtained and could prevent people in der Schweiz Wohnsitz zu begründen (z.B. die gebeutelten Londoner Investment-Banker). Es ist dringend zu empfehlen, die für die heute sehr gut positionierte Schweiz verantwortliche liberale Steuerpolitik fortzuführen und die Initiative entschieden abzulehnen.
0 comments:
Post a Comment